Goals:
I hope to not only discover a method to systematically create a type that is legible and well-designed but to also compile these reasons in a simple guide that can somewhat put to rest discrepancies other designers and non-designers face when using type.
Primary Sources:
I have among other great resources available to me here at City College, a few well-regarded type experts in their field. I will interview Ina Saltz as well as Donald Partyka for their insights on type design and legibility, their findings, and opinions on the subject.
Secondary Sources (Working Bibliography):
Graham, Lisa. Basics of Design: Layout & Typography for Beginners. New York: Delmar, 2002: 184.
Apple’s TrueType Reference Manual Retrieved on 2009-06-21 <>
McGrew, Mac. American Metal Typefaces of the Twentieth Century (second edition). New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Books, 1993: 85-87.
Cullen, Kristin. Layout Workbook: A Real-World Guide to Building Pages in Graphic Design, Jul 2005: 92
Saltz, Ina. Typography Essentials: 100 Design Principles for Working with Type. Gloucester: Rockport Publishers, 2009. Print.
Ryder, John. The Case for Legibility. Moretus Press, Incorporated, 1979.
Goudy, Frederic W. Typologia: Studies in Type Design & Type Making with Comments on the Invention of Typography, the First Types, Legibility & Fine Printing. University of California Press, 1987.
Comparables:
I found this website to be interesting, on digital legibility of type.
http://www.tomontheweb2.ca/CMX/4D5E2/
This website focuses a bit more on layout legibility, but I think the first link is closer to the kind of ways I want to expose the readability of fonts, not only in digital space but physical visual space as well.
Prototyping:
I hope to have developed at least one typeface to conduct experimental trials or surveys that explore legibility and likability of my design to a number of subjects in-house, at home, in the workplace, and at random.
A series of tests will be conducted on the web, on paper, and by interview. I believe posting signs with type and asking whether the signs were noticed, legible, and likable will be reserved for interview subjects in-house; an online survey for those reading the text online or on mobile devices; and a printed survey for those reading the text on printed paper.
Timeline:
I hope to stick closely with the suggested calendar of the thesis workload. This and next week will heavily depend upon the source material, gathering examples of supporting ideas, and interviews.
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Wesley,
ReplyDeleteI suspect some of the secondary sources you list are in fact tertiary. Also, the survey you plan to do with your prototype counts as primary research.
Per my email, I'm concerned about your work load as well as your thesis project lacking specificity.